Investment Banking Hourly Caps

Is the 60-Hour Work Week Cap a Boon or a Bane?

Investment banking has long been synonymous with grueling hours, often reaching 70 to 100 hours a week, particularly when deals are live and deadlines loom.

Recently, some investment banks have instituted a cap on working hours for their summer analysts (aka interns), limiting them to 60 per week.

This move has sparked a significant debate within the industry, raising the question:

Is this cap a step towards a more sustainable work-life balance, or does it undermine the very essence of what it means to work in investment banking?

 The Case FOR a 60-Hour Work Week Cap

1. Better Work-Life Balance

The primary advantage of capping work hours at 60 per week is the promise of a better work-life balance. Investment banking is notorious for its demanding schedule, which often leaves little room for personal time, family, or hobbies.

By instituting a cap, banks can help ensure that their employees have time to recharge, reducing the risk of burnout.

A more balanced lifestyle can lead to increased job satisfaction and overall well-being, making the profession more attractive to top talent who might otherwise be deterred by the notoriously long hours.

2. Easing Into a Demanding Job

For many junior bankers, especially recent graduates, the transition into the workforce can be overwhelming.

Starting a career with a more manageable schedule allows these individuals to ease into the demands of the job.

They can learn the ropes without the added pressure of extreme hours, potentially leading to better retention rates and a more positive introduction to the industry.

3. Reducing Burnout

Burnout is a significant issue in high-stress professions, and investment banking is no exception. Constantly working 70 to 100 hours a week can take a severe toll on mental and physical health.

A 60-hour cap can mitigate this, fostering a healthier work environment.

Employees who are not perpetually exhausted are likely to be more productive, engaged, and motivated, ultimately benefiting the bank’s performance.

The Case AGAINST a 60-Hour Work Week Cap

1. Not Representative of Real Banking Hours

One of the main criticisms of the 60-hour cap is that it is not representative of the actual demands of investment banking.

The nature of the job often requires long hours to meet tight deadlines and manage high-stakes deals.

New employees working under a capped schedule might develop a skewed perception of the industry, only to face a rude awakening when they encounter the true demands of the job later in their careers.

2. Surprise Upon Full-Time Engagement

If junior bankers are shielded from the reality of the job, they might be ill-prepared when they transition to full-time roles with no-hour restrictions.

This could lead to higher turnover rates, as employees who initially found the job manageable might struggle to cope with the increased demands.

It’s crucial for new hires to understand what they are signing up for to make informed career choices.

3. The Reality of Investment Banking Hours

Traditionally, investment bankers are expected to be available around the clock, especially during live deals.

The nature of the work demands quick turnarounds on comments, late-night revisions, and constant availability.

This intense workload is one of the reasons investment bankers are among the highest-paid professionals. The expectation is that they will sacrifice personal time in exchange for lucrative compensation and career advancement opportunities.

Why Long Hours Are Unlikely to Disappear

Despite advancements in technology and the rise of artificial intelligence, the long hours associated with investment banking are unlikely to disappear anytime soon.

The profession requires a level of human judgment, negotiation skills, and client interaction that cannot be fully replicated by AI.

Moreover, the unpredictable nature of deals means that bankers must often be ready to respond at a moment’s notice, regardless of the hour.

Making your way into the buyside? This will be helpful!

Conclusion: Striking a Balance

The move to cap working hours at 60 per week in investment banking is a double-edged sword.

On one hand, it addresses significant issues such as work-life balance and burnout, making the profession more sustainable and attractive.

On the other hand, it risks creating a disconnect between the perceived and actual demands of the job, potentially leading to disillusionment and higher turnover when employees face the real pressures of the industry.

Ultimately, the key may lie in finding a balance. Perhaps a phased approach, where junior bankers start with capped hours but gradually transition to the traditional demands, could provide the best of both worlds.

This would allow new employees to acclimate to the rigors of the job while still maintaining their well-being.

Investment banks must carefully consider these factors to ensure they foster a sustainable and realistic working environment that prepares employees for the long haul while maintaining their health and job satisfaction.

Are you preparing for the buyside? Schedule a call now with our top coaches or submit your application directly here and we’ll be in touch!

Our experienced coaches will work with you to set and achieve your goals and provide support and guidance along the way.

Visit the OfficeHours Blog and follow us on our social media accounts: Instagram, LinkedIn, YouTube, TikTok, and Twitter for our latest updates.